Tuesday, February 19, 2019
Apush Chapter 9 Study Guide Essay
Lindsay AdamsMrs. WilkinsonAPUSH Pd. 512 September 2013Chapter 9 direct Guide1. How did the ultra American ideas of natural human rights, equality & exemption from the governing bodyal tyranny affect developments in the immediate post- rotatory item? (1783-1789) transformationary American ideas from organization tyranny affected development in the post-Revolutionary period by making it impossible for a strong federal government to be created. Since the colonies fought to get out of a federal government, they did not fate to create another one, so, congress was forced to make a fragile federal government dealed the Articles of federation. It gave no effect to the government, but gave all federal agency to the central governments of the colonies. 2. What significant change to the new United States resulted from the revolutionary warf atomic number 18? Freedom from England was the primary change of the new United States.The colonies, now called raises, were officially ind ependent from majuscule Britain when the Treaty of Paris was signed in France in 1783. Other alterations included the lack of an executive branch of government, to a greater extent than rights, exemption of religion, freedom of speech, and several others. 3. Describe the powers of the interior(a) government under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation created a one-house legislature as the Confederations main institution, making the government a unicameral system of government. In addition, Congress could drop d ingest conflicts among the states, issue coins, borrow money, and make treaties with other countries and with Native Americans. Congress could comparablewise ask the states for money and soldiers. 4. What were the major scant(p)nesses and strengths of the Articles of Confederation government? Why do some historians call it the Critical Period? The Articles of Confederation was drafted during the years 1776 and 1777, opus the colonists were stil l fighting for independence, it created a weak national government with most of the governmental powers retained by the states. The Articles provided no separation of branches. There was no president or any other independent executive, nor was there a federal juridical branch. Congress, the legislature, was the only branch of government. Members elected to congressdid not vote as individuals, but as states. While congress did train some powers, it could not enforce its laws on the states or the people. States were permitted to coin their own money.There was no regulation of commerce between the states and states could even discharge into treaties with foreign nations and declare war, with the consent of Congress. Congress could not tax the states or the people it could only request funds to run the government. Since the Revolution created an ample debt, and there was no way to tax the colonies with such a weak government, the need for a federal government was great. 5. What moti vated the founding fathers to call for a convention to modify the Articles? What was the significance of chaise longues ascension? The Founding Fathers wanted a new constitution because the current government of the Articles of Confederation was not functional due to the balance of powers between state/federal governments and Shays sedition. The document gave state governments too a great deal power and left the federal government helpless in twain defending and caring for American interests which led to almost no oneness of the states. The federal government was powerless to stop Shays rebellion and Congress had little power. The Articles of Confederation had no chief executive, Congress had no power to tax citizens directly, no power to draft an army, had no national court system, no power to settle arguments among states, and many to a greater extent than. Shays Rebellion was a rebellion against the Articles of Confederation in 1787.There were many unfair laws that the wo rking kin couldnt fight, there were polling taxes and that made it hard for the working single out to vote, there was no common currency so the working class would sometimes be cheated out of money, and it was really hard for them to set prices on their goods. 6. Explain the Virginia Plan, the New Jersey Plan, and the Connecticut Compromise. The NJ plan was an try out to make the country vote by equal representation where separately state would send the same amount of delegates to represent them. The Virginia plan was an exploit to start representation by population where the states would send more or less delegates depending on how big the state was. The CT Compromise/Great Compromise benefitted both large and small states. There was representation in the House based on population and equal representation in the Senate. 7. Explain the 3/5th Compromise.States ideally wanted to have more representation in the House of Representatives, in order to have more voice in the federal g overnment. However, southern states, which refused to give Blacks the slightest of rights (due to the already intrench ideals of slavery) wanted to make the most of their black populations to achieve greater representation. It was in conclusion decided (in part because of Southern threats to not join the new nation) that severally slave would count as 3/5 of a individual for representation purposes. 8. Explain the first three articles of the geological formation. Which body of the government was exposit in each article and how did federal powers under the new organic law contrast with federal powers under the Articles? The first three articles of the Constitution realized all three branches of government and their powers. The first article defines the Legislative Branch, its powers, members, and workings. The piece Article of the Constitution that defines the Executive Branch, its powers, duties, and means of removal. The Article of the Constitution that sets up the Judicia l Branch and defines treason is the third article.The constitution possessed more federalist ideas, giving more power to the national government rather than the states. 9. Who were the Anti-Federalists, what was their major objection to the Constitution, and why did they lose their struggle to the Federalists? The Anti-Federalists did not want to ratify the Constitution. They argued that it gave too much power to the national government at the outgo of the state governments. These were the people of a high class. Because the majority of the states supported the Constitution and anti-federalists wished to remain a union, they accepted the document which was as well issued with a measuring stick of rights. 10. Which of the social changes brought about by the Revolution was the most significant? Could the Revolution have gone further toward the principle that all men are created equal by ending slavery or granting womens rights? Women became more politically involved throughout the revolution although no womens rights were officially established until later on. Native American relationships with the Americans improved as well. piffling opposition against slavery initiated in Pennsylvania.The biggest change was that people felt like they had a voice in their government instead of having birthrights determine who was in charge. Yes if slavery was abolished and womens rights were established, that statement could have been more valid. Big enquiryShould the Constitution be seen as a conservative reaction to the Revolution, an enshrinement of revolutionary principles or both? The Constitution should be seen both as a conservative reaction to the Revolution and an enshrinement of revolutionary principles because it reflected conservative principles but also promoted the idea of a strong republicanism. The wealthy were still in power most of those in Congress were wealthy. The rights of certain people were still moderate under the Constitution like women and slav es. However, the government was still based on the consent of the people and governments power was limited. The system of block off and balance is the most original aspect of the Constitution. There were three branches, the legislative, executive, and judicial and each had its own power as well as an hazard to check the other branched to assure that no branch abuse its power.Key Terms & PeopleVirginia Statute for Religious Freedom Shays RebellionArticles of Confederation Daniel ShaysOld northwesterly Patrick HenryNorthwest Ordinance Great CompromiseLand Ordinance of 1785 The Federalist
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment