Bias, Rhetorical Devices and Argumentation Essay Example for Free

Bias, rhetorical Devices and Argumentation EssayThe vocabulary it obviously catering towards females, the destination was presented at a U.N. Womens Conference, this speech is about the rights women should expect to receive under tender-hearted rights. time using the politics to reinforce the rights of women she is using political bias and she is using a gender bias.rhetorical DevicesThis speech has a couple rhetorical devices, the first one I found was a Rhetorical question when she said, Wasnt it after all after the womens conference in Nairobi x years ago that the world focused for the first time on the crisis of domestic violence? second there was a few sections were Parallelism was used when she said If women have a chance to lick and earn as full and equal partners in society, their families will flourish. And when families flourish, communities and nations do as well. then again when she stated It is a violation of human rights when babies are denied food, or drown ed, or suffocated, or their spines broken, evidently because they are born girls. It is a violation of human rights when women and girls are sold into the sla truly of prostitution for human greed and the kinds of reasons that are used to justify this practice should no longer be tolerated.FallaciesTowards the end of the speech a Slippery slope fallacies was used when she stated As long as discrimination and inequities stop so commonplace everywhere in the world, as long as girls and women are valued less, supply less, fed last, overworked, underpaid, not schooled, subjected to violence in and outside their homes the potential of the human family to create a peaceful, prospered world will not be realized.ArgumentationThis speech met the standard for stating an argument and defend against counter arguments by stating facts that the opposition cannot challenge. There was use of statistics to support Mrs. Clintons argument that women and girls have the alike rights as everyone el se. She presented her argument in a persuasive way, using her gender to persuade other mountain of the same gender to understand the issue and presented what needed to be changed. I would say that the argument she presented was very effective. The crowd was applauding the speech instead of using silence to show their disapproval of the words that were said.