Theories of Personality Development: An Evaluation

Theories of Personality training An Evaluation incoming On Personality DevelopmentThe ontogenesis of record across respective(prenominal) life bottomland be observed from three different views, such as behaving, striving and present from a person (McAdams and Olson, 2010). In additional, Mc Adams and Olson, 2010, explained the evidence in early childhood, a wide differences in neighborly fulfil patterns tolerate predicted in the long term developmental which, clearly explained the innovation from early temperament into adult dispositional traits.Personality Development is an eventful factor, as it concerned with the systematic transformation of individuals and personalities as they move through their lives (Graziano, 2003). hence, psychologist sustain been interested in determineing the track of homo developmental functioning basis of an early st progress in the life course, which will set both long term stability and change.Freudian Theory On Personality Development In the founder of disposition development hypothesis, is the Freudian psychoanalytic theory (PAT). (Freud, 1940/1969), linked genius with id, ego and superego, he take down that id is an important part of our personality because as newborns, it allows us to get our grassroots demand, it is similarly known as our pleasure principle, id instinct demanding immediate merriment rather for a tardyr reward, which the term is also known as delay gratification, while ego acts as a vestibular aesthesis among id and superego, which is known as the reality principle, ego helps to pile to experience their needfully and desires, that could also harm them in a long run, and finally superego, the sh be of personality composed of our internalized ideals that we have acquired from our p arents and from society, it provides guidelines for making judgments. Freud psychoanalytic theory was widely debate and enhance further by opposite theorist. (Magnavita, 2003), address that come fo rth into two categories, the normal type of people and people who are dysfunctional. In Magnavita theory, he presented an unifying relational model that blends psychodynamic, cognitive, and systems theory to analyse and understand the behaviours , intuitive feelings and emotions, as well as techniques and modalities, especially for personality dysfunction in front every proceeding any further treatment. The reason being is that Freud research, changes people concept of conceive ofing about childrens experiences in early puerility(Brooks, 2010). Freud believed that the symptoms of anxiety occurs in galore(postnominal) adults were realise during their childhood experiences (Brooks, 2010). In other words, a childs development would directly influence how unitary behaves as an adult. The way that the adult behaviour, as well as the way they doing things, may directly link to something that happen in their childhood, especially when the feeling of fear and anxiety (Brooks, 2010).P sychoanalytic theory has also given psychologists a number of helpful concepts, such as the unconscious, the ego, and identity operator, which have plump a part of every language as well as theory (Cramer, 2000).Apart from knowing how personality is developed through individual needs as a child, and how it will affect them in a exsert period of time. In the succeeding(a) part of the essay, other theorist is exit share about their own point of view on personality development, such as Erik Erikson psychosocial, and Alfred Adler, birth order development, as well as, how it can contribute towards personality development.Erikson And His Theory Of Personality DevelopmentIn the late 1920s, Erik Erikson, helped to develop a program to teach art to children of Freuds entourage. Erikson wife Joan Serson, who field of operations psychoanalysis, convince him to join her in the analogous path (Cloninger, 2003). Erikson started off as a lay analyst because of his non medical training, non long after, he became part of Freuds inner circle. Due to the fear, increased in anti-Semitism, Erikson and his wife distinct to leave Germany for United States to expand his career (Cloninger, 2003).In Eriksons model of the stages of human development extends beyond childhood and adolescence to include middle and old age despite the adult years, from roughly 20 through 60, were described by only two ego stages ( Erikson, 1963). Erikson believed the individual progresses through eight psychosocial stages to establish new orientations to egotism and the social world over time ( Hiller and Barrow, 2010).(Dunkel and Sefcek, 2009), in the table of Erikson eight stages of psychosocial, it shows the period in life, such as infancy ( Trust vs Mistrust), Toddlerhood (Autonomy vs Shame), Preschool ( Initiative vs Guilt), Childhood ( Industry vs Inferiority), Adolescence ( Identity vs Role confusion), five-year-old matureness ( Intimacy vs Isolation), Can I Love?, Middle adulthood ( Gener atively vs Stagnation), and Late adulthood ( Integrity vs Despair).The sequence of stages in Eriksons theory is establish on the epigenetic principle, which means that each psychosocial strength has its own period of limited importance, and may produce either a positive or a negative resolution of the challenge, and the ego re writers that individuals gain or do not gain on completion of whizz stage are brought with them to the next stage of development ( Kail and Cavanaugh, 2012).Compare Freuds Theory with Eriksons TheorySigmund Freuds psycho grammatical genderual theory and Erik Eriksons psychosocial theory are two well known theories of development. Erikson was influenced by Freuds ideas, but his theory are differed in a number of important ways. Like Freud, Erikson believed that personality development in a series of mold stages (Smith, 2000/2007/2010). Unlike Freuds theory of psychosexual stages, who proposed that if the child experienced sexual licking in any of the five s tages of psychosexual developmental stage, he or she would experience anxiety that would persist into adulthood as a neurosis, a functional mental disorder while Eriksons explained further from what Freud have left-hand(a) with the impact of social experience across the whole lifespan which is also known as psychosocial personality development, (Smith, 2000/2007/2010),.The first 5 stages of Erikson is similar to Freud psychosexual development ( Dunkel and Sefcek, 2009). Eriksons last three stages deal with early, middle and posterior adulthood. check to Dunkel and Sefeck, 2009 studies, they undermine the importance on the last three stages of Erikson Personality development, in the early adulthood the main issue of growth and development of identity is intimacy, which involves relationships in friendship, sex, competition and cooperation that are emphasized, and in middle adulthood, is the ability to take for others and in doing so to create a legacy is the primary developmental task, during this stage generatively involves a concern for the welfare of society rather than contemned with self absorption ( the ability to create, care for, and to share are the positive outcomes of balance in middle adulthood ), the later adulthood, which is the integrity versus despair ( the sense of fulfilment throughout their life or a sense of sorrowfulness and despair over a life misspent).Alfred alder Personality DevelopmentAlfred Alder, an Austrian psychiatry, who joined Freuds discussing groups in 1907. He wrote papers on original lower status, ( when, individuals tries to compensate for their own defect or weakness, if the effort of compensate fails, it could fly the coop to an inferiority complexity ) and childrens feelings of inferiority, which he claim that the child development of inferiority is due to the basic helplessness of the human infant ( Adler, 1917).Alder catch personality development around the same time as Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud, as they work hand in hand with some theories until the day when Alder reject Freuds keep on linking personality solely on sex factors, and maintained that personality difficulties are rooted in a feeling of inferiority deriving from restrictions on the individuals need for self assertion ( pekan, 2001).(Adler, 1927) accent the other factor that contribute factor to personality development would be the birth order, calming that it contributed significantly to the development of an individuals style of life. where each children is toughened uniquely within the family, depending on their order of birth, such the ( first child, the aged child, the second child, the middle and youngest child, etc).Adler expanding many of his studies toward application in educational models ( Palencik, 2011). His theories on birth order was later further study other theorists.From the sight of the media, it explained that if the child is first born, he or she is orderly and likely to become a leader ( Lampi and Nordblom, 2008 ). In addition Lampi and Nordblom, 2008 say that individual who think that the only child, who childhood was always never going to surpassed by any of their brothers or sisters, would be more eager to achieve succeederful than others as they grow up, while the last born, who go through his or her undefiled upbringing and could not achieve as much as his or her older siblings, would not have the same equal concerned with the relational position.(Sulloway, 1996) claims that the first borns are more conscientious than later borns at the same time as, later borns are more agreeable and extraverted, while Freese, Powell and Carr steelworker (1999), find that small differences in social attitudes between first borns and later borns. However Saroglou and Fiasse (2003) argue that it is important to recognize between middle- borns and the youngest and not just now treating both groups as later borns. Moreover, Beck, Burnet and Vosper (2006) find it a within family study t hat first borns score higher on dominance and later borns are more towards sociability.Comparing Alfred Alder Personality Development Theories With Freud( Fisher et al 2012) The similarity of Alder and Freud is, Alder believed that humans are motivated by a unconscious forces and that these forces create conflict this conflict provides the motivation for personality formation and change. In contrast to Freud, Adler did not believe that people are primarily driven by sexual and aggressive instincts. In addition, Fisher and the other theorist says that Adlers theory of individual psychology focus on the role of each individual person in their attempts to seek success in relation to their individual experiences in the world.In retrospection, the specific personality qualities of an individual, which lead to individual differences between people, are not fully establish on evolution, however, there are many products on the developmental factors. The developmental study of individual dif ferences in personality provides a variety source of data for the researcher and practitioner alike to use in sympathy and predicting behavior. Without the study of individual differences, there would be no clear description on an analysis or explanation of why people practically behave or develop very differently under patently equivalent environmental conditions.This essay had show that, different theorist have their own way of explaining on how personality is being developed, such as Freuds psychoanalytic theory, the stage of development, Erikson psychosocial and the 8 stages of personality development and so on. bank recent years, personality development is widely interested by many theorist, which still lead to an endless debate.(1790 words )ReferenceAdler, A. (1917). The neurotic institution Outline of a comparative individualistic psychology and psychotherapy. New York Moffat.Alder, A. (1927). spirit human nature. New York Greenberg.Beck, E., Burney, K. L., Vosper, J. (2006). Personality and individual differences. Birth-Order Effects On Facets Of Extraversion, 40, 953-959.Brooks, J. (2010). The litigate of parenting (8th edition) (ISBN 13 9780073378763 ISBN 10 0073378763).Cramer, P. (2000). Defense mechanisms in psychology today gain ground processes for adaptation. American Psychologist, 55, 637-646.Cramer, P. (1999). Ego functions and ego development Defense mechanisms and intelligence as predictors of ego level. Journal of Personality, 67, 735-760.Cloninger, C. R. ( 2003 ). Completing the psychobiological architecture of human personality development Temperament, Character, Coherence. Understanding Human Development Dialogues With life-timespan Psychology, 159-182.Dunkel C.S., Sefcek J.A. (2009) Eriksonian Lifespan Theory and Life History Theory An Integration Using the Example of Identity Formation. refreshen of General Psychology, 13(1), 13-23.Erikson, E. H. (1963). Basic Books. Youth change and challenge (ISBN 13 978-0465093519, ISBN 10 0465093515).Freud, S. (1940/1969). An outline of psychoanalysis. New York Norton.Fisher, M. (2001). Alfred Adler. Muskingum college department of psychology. Retrieve from http//elvers.us/hop/index.asp?m=3a=65key=117Freese, J., Power, B., Carr Steelman, L. (1999). rear without a cause or effect birth order and social attitudes. American Sociological Review, 64, 207-231.Fisher, H., Freeman, M., Mitchell, L., Reed, S., Upton, A. (2012). Theories of human psychological functioning a comparison. University of Phoenix.Graziano, G., W. (2003). ledger of personality. Personality Development An Introduction Toward Process Approaches To Long-Term Stability and reassign in Persons, 71(6), 893-904Kail, V. R., Cavanaugh, J.C. ( 2012 ). Essentials of human development. A Life-Span View. Retrieve from http//books.google.com.sg/books?id=nLMF-0JBNekCpg=PA10lpg=PA10dq=erikson+psychosocial+eight+stages+built+on+one+another+2010source=blots=8COktoHu7ssig=dQBORquQiaU7NjrNVRM1EKr8ROMhl=ensa=Xe i=YuQLVIniDpK9uATisIKYAgved=0CDcQ6AEwAwv=onepageq=erikson psychosocial eight stages built on one another 2010f=falseLampi, E., Nordblom, K. (2008). Working papers in economics. Money and success Sibling And Birth-Order-Effects On Positional Concerns. Retrieve from https//gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/9989/1/gunwpe0299.pdfMagnavita, J., J. (2003). handbook of personality disorders. Theory And Practice. Retrieve from http//books.google.com.sg/books?id=jhtvBV3i0rkCpg=PA68lpg=PA68dq=magnavita+presented+an+integrative+relational+model+that+blends+psychodynamic,+cognitive,+and+systems+theorysource=blots=vljW9Y9i87sig=FrjKAExOtY3jCpRATo0BlhNHr28hl=ensa=Xei=C5UCVJCHConY8gXQ2ICwAwved=0CBwQ6AEwAAv=onepageq=magnavita presented an integrative relational model that blends psychodynamic, cognitive, and systems theoryf=falseMcAdams, D.P., Olson, B.D. ( 2010). annu rev psychol. Personality Development doggedness And Change Over The Life Course, 61, 517-42.Palencik, J. (2011). Noncognitive affe ct a study of head teacher and emotion. Proquest Dissertations and theses, Retrieve from http//ezproxy.utas.edu.au/login?url=http//search.proquest.com/docview/854341352?account id=14245Smith, I. (2000/2007/2010). Freud complete works. Retrieve from http//www.valas.fr/IMG/pdf/Freud_Complete_Works.pdfSulloway, Frank J. (1996). born(p) to rebel birth order, family dynamics, andcreative lives. New York Pantheon. Retrieve from http//www.sulloway.org/Holcomb.pdfSaroglous, V., Fiasse, L. (2003). Birth order, personality, and righteousness A study among young adults from a three-sibling family. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 19-29